PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMST vs. ZSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMST vs. ZSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amesite Inc. (AMST) and zSpace, Inc (ZSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMST achieves a -26.46% return, which is significantly higher than ZSPC's -98.25% return.


AMST

1D
3.73%
1M
42.08%
YTD
-26.46%
6M
-43.72%
1Y
-52.40%
3Y*
-29.64%
5Y*
-44.99%
10Y*

ZSPC

1D
14.22%
1M
8.27%
YTD
-98.25%
6M
-98.00%
1Y
-99.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMST vs. ZSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMST
Amesite Inc.
-26.46%-60.21%43.94%
ZSPC
zSpace, Inc
-98.25%-97.04%-27.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AMST and ZSPC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMST:

$6.42M

ZSPC:

$286.66K

EPS

AMST:

-$0.65

ZSPC:

-$24.43

PS Ratio

AMST:

18.66

ZSPC:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMST:

$341.44K

ZSPC:

$26.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMST:

$88.28K

ZSPC:

$12.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMST:

-$2.75M

ZSPC:

-$21.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Amesite Inc.

zSpace, Inc

Often compared with AMST:
AMST vs. NET

Return for Risk

AMST vs. ZSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMST
AMST Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMST Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMST Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSPC
ZSPC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ZSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMST vs. ZSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amesite Inc. (AMST) and zSpace, Inc (ZSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMSTZSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.65

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

-1.00

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

-1.25

-0.02

AMST vs. ZSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMST Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the ZSPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMST and ZSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMSTZSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

-0.53

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

-0.53

+0.16

Drawdowns

AMST vs. ZSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMST drawdown since its inception was -99.23%, roughly equal to the maximum ZSPC drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMST and ZSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMSTZSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.23%

-99.98%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.69%

-99.89%

+20.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.64%

-99.97%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-80.92%

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.16%

80.50%

-39.34%

Volatility

AMST vs. ZSPC - Volatility Comparison

Amesite Inc. (AMST) has a higher volatility of 93.25% compared to zSpace, Inc (ZSPC) at 83.96%. This indicates that AMST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMSTZSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

93.25%

83.96%

+9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

119.50%

171.49%

-51.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

160.25%

188.38%

-28.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

135.62%

188.47%

-52.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

131.45%

188.47%

-57.02%

Dividends

AMST vs. ZSPC - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMST nor ZSPC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AMST vs. ZSPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amesite Inc. and zSpace, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20222023202420252026
83.33K
5.25M
(AMST) Total Revenue
(ZSPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AMST and ZSPC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMST has higher volatility (93.25%) compared to ZSPC (83.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMST dropped -99.23% vs ZSPC's -99.98%.

AMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMST and ZSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer