PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMRMX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMRMX achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return. Over the past 10 years, AMRMX has underperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 11.22%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


AMRMX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.96%
YTD
6.66%
6M
6.89%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
11.22%

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMRMX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A
6.66%16.08%14.93%9.43%-4.49%24.99%4.52%21.53%-2.25%17.53%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AMRMX and RESGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.88

The correlation between AMRMX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMRMX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMRMX
AMRMX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AMRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMRMXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.56

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

5.89

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

21.39

-12.34

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMRMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMRMX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMRMXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

3.21

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.61

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.71

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.72

0.00

Drawdowns

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMRMX drawdown since its inception was -48.75%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMRMX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMRMXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.75%

-37.80%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-7.84%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-20.50%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.31%

-23.58%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.81%

-37.80%

+7.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.00%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.15%

-0.18%

Volatility

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX) is 2.33%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that AMRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMRMXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

5.45%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

11.00%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.48%

14.41%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

17.26%

-4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

18.71%

-4.59%

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMRMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMRMX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

AMRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMRMX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A
7.10%7.55%6.27%3.75%4.88%4.65%1.74%4.60%6.44%5.96%4.83%6.54%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMRMX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to AMRMX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMRMX dropped -48.75% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMRMX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer