PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOMX vs. QCELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMOMX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCELX

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.79%
YTD
18.09%
6M
19.95%
1Y
38.37%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMOMX
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund
11.26%15.36%27.62%18.17%-18.00%26.01%26.86%29.20%-4.01%23.87%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
18.09%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%24.33%-10.96%22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOMX and QCELX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.93

The correlation between AMOMX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMOMX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOMX

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMOMXQCELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

Drawdowns

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMXQCELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

Volatility

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMOMXQCELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMOMX and QCELX have an expense ratio of 0.41%.


Dividends

AMOMX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

AMOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.65%, more than QCELX's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMOMX
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund
30.65%25.49%14.05%14.08%10.95%17.95%16.14%10.22%12.17%9.15%8.23%8.44%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.19%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMOMX and QCELX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMOMX and QCELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer