PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOMX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMOMX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTQGX

1D
0.22%
1M
9.32%
YTD
32.36%
6M
30.89%
1Y
55.95%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
20.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMOMX
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund
11.26%15.36%27.62%18.17%-18.00%26.01%26.86%29.20%-4.01%23.87%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
32.36%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOMX and FTQGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2009

0.94

The correlation between AMOMX and FTQGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMOMX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMOMXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.97

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

Volatility

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMOMXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.72%

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOMX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMOMX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

AMOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.65%, more than FTQGX's 9.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMOMX
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund
30.65%25.49%14.05%14.08%10.95%17.95%16.14%10.22%12.17%9.15%8.23%8.44%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.40%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMOMX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMOMX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer