PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMIGX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMIGX achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 20.05% return.


AMIGX

1D
2.15%
1M
-1.50%
6M
8.98%
YTD
11.66%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
16.89%
ALL TIME*
15.28%

FLCOX

1D
0.49%
1M
1.47%
6M
14.83%
YTD
20.05%
1Y
32.24%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMIGX
Amana Growth Fund
11.66%17.89%16.01%26.00%-19.30%31.80%32.97%33.43%2.70%29.22%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
20.05%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AMIGX and FLCOX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.73

The correlation between AMIGX and FLCOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMIGX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMIGX
AMIGX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AMIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AMIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMIGXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

4.35

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

18.62

-10.73

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMIGX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMIGX drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, smaller than the maximum FLCOX drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMIGX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMIGXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.95%

-38.28%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-6.80%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-15.60%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-19.00%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

-0.56%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-4.39%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.60%

+1.30%

Volatility

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) at 2.92%. This indicates that AMIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMIGXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

2.92%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.13%

8.72%

+5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

11.43%

+6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

14.84%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

17.56%

+0.94%

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMIGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMIGX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

AMIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than FLCOX's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMIGX
Amana Growth Fund
0.17%0.19%4.02%0.82%3.88%0.74%5.42%3.37%3.61%11.11%13.79%7.61%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
0.87%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMIGX and FLCOX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMIGX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to FLCOX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMIGX dropped -27.95% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMIGX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer