AMID vs. VNQI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) and VNQI (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Argent, while VNQI is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. AMID is actively managed, while VNQI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMID returned 11.79%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for VNQI. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMID charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VNQI.

Performance

AMID vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMID achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's -0.33% return.

AMID

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 9.85%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VNQI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 8.59%
• 5Y*: -1.50%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMID vs. VNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	7.01%	-1.39%	13.06%	31.26%	-7.01%
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	-0.33%	21.38%	-2.22%	6.99%	-9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between AMID and VNQI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022	0.56

The correlation between AMID and VNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMID vs. VNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMID	VNQI
Industrials	32.1%	0.7%
Technology	18.1%	0.2%
Financial Services	14.7%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	1.1%
Healthcare	7.2%	0.0%
Energy	4.3%	0.3%
Basic Materials	3.4%	0.3%
Real Estate	3.3%	91.2%
Utilities	2.9%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

AMID vs. VNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 21
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

VNQI

VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 16
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMID vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMID	VNQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.43	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	0.70	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.09	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	0.40	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.78	1.13	+1.65

AMID vs. VNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the VNQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMID and VNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMID vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum VNQI drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and VNQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMID	VNQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-38.35%	+15.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-14.78%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-16.35%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-9.99%	+6.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-10.89%	+4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	5.19%	-1.63%

Volatility

AMID vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison

Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) at 4.62%. This indicates that AMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMID	VNQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.84%	4.62%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	11.75%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	13.73%	+2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.17%	15.54%	+3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.17%	16.07%	+3.10%

AMID vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMID vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VNQI's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	4.72%	4.70%	5.16%	3.74%	0.57%	6.48%	0.93%	7.58%	4.62%	3.86%	5.18%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMID and VNQI in my portfolio?

AMID and VNQI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMID or VNQI?

AMID has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to VNQI (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMID dropped -23.32% vs VNQI's -38.35%.

Which ETF is better, AMID or VNQI?

On 3-year performance, AMID leads with 11.79% vs 8.59% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMID or VNQI?

Over the 3-year period, AMID has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMID or VNQI?

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMID or VNQI?

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.33% for AMID.

What is the main difference between AMID and VNQI?

AMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VNQI is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Argent and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.12% for VNQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.