AMID vs. USFR
AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Argent, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. AMID is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMID returned 12.34%/yr vs 4.72%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. AMID charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
AMID vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMID achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return.
AMID
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
AMID vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 7.61% | -1.39% | 13.06% | 31.26% | -7.01% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.78% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMID and USFR is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022 | -0.06 |
The correlation between AMID and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMID vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
AMID
USFR
AMID vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMID | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -48.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 13.24 | -12.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 200.29 | -199.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 775.73 | -772.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMID vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMID | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -1.36% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -0.02% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | -0.06% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | 0.00% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -0.15% | -6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 0.01% | +3.54% |
Volatility
AMID vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that AMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMID | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 0.08% | +5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.65% | 0.19% | +12.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 0.27% | +16.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 0.40% | +18.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 0.78% | +18.35% |
AMID vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMID vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMID and USFR have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMID has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMID dropped -23.32% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 3-year performance, AMID leads with 12.34% vs 4.72% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AMID has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.33% for AMID.
AMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Argent and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMID and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer