PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMID vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMID vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMID achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.40% return.


AMID

1D
0.46%
1M
2.58%
YTD
7.01%
6M
4.94%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
10Y*

TIP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.42%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMID vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
7.01%-1.39%13.06%31.26%-7.01%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.40%6.77%1.65%3.80%-6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AMID and TIP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMID vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMID
AMID Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMID vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMIDTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.34

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

7.00

-4.22

AMID vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMID and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMID vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMIDTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.32%

-14.57%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-1.98%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

-4.54%

-18.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-0.46%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-3.43%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

0.66%

+2.90%

Volatility

AMID vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.03%. This indicates that AMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMIDTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

1.03%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

2.32%

+10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

3.39%

+13.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

6.21%

+12.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

5.74%

+13.43%

AMID vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMID vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than TIP's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
0.33%0.36%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.76%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMID and TIP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMID has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMID dropped -23.32% vs TIP's -14.57%.

On 3-year performance, AMID leads with 11.79% vs 4.00% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMID has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.

TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.33% for AMID.

AMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while TIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Argent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.18% for TIP.

TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMID and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer