PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMID vs. FEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMID vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMID

1D
1.66%
1M
1.14%
YTD
5.85%
6M
4.01%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
10Y*

FEMG

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.84%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMID vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMID and FEMG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.70

AMID vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMID
FEMG

Industrials

32.1%
26.5%

Technology

18.1%
24.0%

Financial Services

14.7%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
17.4%

Healthcare

7.2%
12.6%

Energy

4.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.4%
0.7%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.8%

Utilities

2.9%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
1.4%

Communication Services

-

2.7%

Industrials

AMID
32.1%
FEMG
26.5%

Technology

AMID
18.1%
FEMG
24.0%

Financial Services

AMID
14.7%
FEMG
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AMID
11.4%
FEMG
17.4%

Healthcare

AMID
7.2%
FEMG
12.6%

Energy

AMID
4.3%
FEMG
3.3%

Basic Materials

AMID
3.4%
FEMG
0.7%

Real Estate

AMID
3.3%
FEMG
1.8%

Utilities

AMID
2.9%
FEMG
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

AMID
2.6%
FEMG
1.4%

Communication Services

AMID

-

FEMG
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMID vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMID
AMID Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMID vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMIDFEMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.83

AMID vs. FEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMIDFEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

6.56

-6.02

Drawdowns

AMID vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and FEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMIDFEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.32%

-3.29%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-0.34%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-0.95%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

Volatility

AMID vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMIDFEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

12.04%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

12.04%

+7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

12.04%

+7.07%

AMID vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMID vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
0.34%0.36%0.33%0.43%0.25%
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMID and FEMG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.

AMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.

They also come from different issuers: Argent and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.23% for FEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMID and FEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer