AMID vs. FEMG
AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) and FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMID charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FEMG.
Performance
AMID vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMID
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMID vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 0.42% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMID and FEMG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.70 |
AMID vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMID
FEMG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Industrials
AMID
FEMG
Technology
AMID
FEMG
Financial Services
AMID
FEMG
Consumer Cyclical
AMID
FEMG
Healthcare
AMID
FEMG
Energy
AMID
FEMG
Basic Materials
AMID
FEMG
Real Estate
AMID
FEMG
Utilities
AMID
FEMG
Consumer Defensive
AMID
FEMG
Communication Services
AMID
-
FEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMID vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank
AMID
FEMG
AMID vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMID | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMID | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 6.56 | -6.02 |
Drawdowns
AMID vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and FEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMID | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -3.29% | -20.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -0.34% | -4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -0.95% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility
AMID vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMID | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.08% | 12.04% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 12.04% | +7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 12.04% | +7.07% |
AMID vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMID vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison
AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMID and FEMG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.
AMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Argent and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.23% for FEMG.
Find the right allocation for AMID and FEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer