AMID vs. BITI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Argent, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. AMID is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMID returned 9.74%/yr vs -31.77%/yr for BITI. Their -0.33 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMID charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

AMID vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMID achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.

AMID

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: 4.61%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: 9.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.94%

BITI

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -2.58%
• 6M: 22.77%
• YTD: 27.11%
• 1Y: 58.64%
• 3Y*: -31.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	$353.84K	$312.78K	$391.35K
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	$24.10M	$26.49M	$38.71M

AMID vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	6.88%	-1.39%	13.06%	31.26%	-7.01%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	27.11%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	21.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AMID and BITI is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.37
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022	-0.33

Return for Risk

AMID vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 20
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 23

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 61
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMID vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMID	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.45	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	2.02	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.24	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	2.53	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	6.17	-4.48

AMID vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMID and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMID vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMID	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-92.16%	+68.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-25.28%	+12.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-84.63%	+61.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-86.12%	+82.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.12%	-68.59%	+62.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	10.35%	-6.80%

Volatility

AMID vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) is 4.44%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that AMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMID	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	9.13%	-4.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.77%	33.31%	-20.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	44.23%	-27.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.03%	52.03%	-33.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	52.03%	-33.00%

AMID vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMID vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BITI's 15.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.17%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMID and BITI in my portfolio?

AMID and BITI have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMID or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to AMID (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMID dropped -23.32% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, AMID or BITI?

On 3-year performance, AMID leads with 9.74% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, AMID is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, AMID has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMID or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, AMID has performed better with a 9.74% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMID or BITI?

AMID is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMID or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 0.33% for AMID.

What is the main difference between AMID and BITI?

AMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Argent and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.