PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMFFX vs. RIDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Mutual Fund Class F-1 (AMFFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMFFX achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly higher than RIDAX's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, AMFFX has outperformed RIDAX with an annualized return of 11.19%, while RIDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.65% annualized return.


AMFFX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.95%
YTD
6.63%
6M
6.84%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
11.19%

RIDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.89%
YTD
5.99%
6M
6.96%
1Y
14.85%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
7.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFFX
American Mutual Fund Class F-1
6.63%15.99%14.87%9.36%-4.54%25.04%4.73%21.48%-2.37%17.44%
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
5.99%16.83%9.49%6.16%-7.14%16.47%3.68%17.57%-6.06%11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AMFFX and RIDAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

0.94

The correlation between AMFFX and RIDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMFFX vs. RIDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMFFX
AMFFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AMFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RIDAX
RIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Mutual Fund Class F-1 (AMFFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMFFXRIDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.47

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

9.14

-0.13

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the RIDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMFFX and RIDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMFFXRIDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.12

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.73

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.72

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.68

-0.12

Drawdowns

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMFFX drawdown since its inception was -48.76%, which is greater than RIDAX's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMFFX and RIDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMFFXRIDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.76%

-42.37%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-6.13%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-8.71%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

-16.28%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.83%

-26.22%

-3.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-4.40%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.65%

+0.32%

Volatility

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Volatility Comparison

American Mutual Fund Class F-1 (AMFFX) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX) at 2.03%. This indicates that AMFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMFFXRIDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.03%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

5.61%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

7.13%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

9.48%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

10.69%

+3.43%

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMFFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than RIDAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMFFX vs. RIDAX - Dividend Comparison

AMFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, less than RIDAX's 8.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMFFX
American Mutual Fund Class F-1
7.09%7.53%6.26%3.72%4.84%4.73%1.95%4.56%6.38%5.89%4.78%6.48%
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
8.74%9.24%5.14%2.38%6.20%5.92%2.09%4.25%6.58%3.68%2.32%4.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMFFX and RIDAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMFFX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to RIDAX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMFFX dropped -48.76% vs RIDAX's -42.37%.

RIDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMFFX and RIDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer