PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF (ESNB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMES.DE achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than ESNB.DE's -7.20% return.


AMES.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.00%
6M
11.03%
YTD
13.77%
1Y
43.12%
3Y*
31.43%
5Y*
22.11%
10Y*
12.04%

ESNB.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.70%
6M
-5.93%
YTD
-7.20%
1Y
-5.98%
3Y*
-1.71%
5Y*
-1.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
13.77%55.41%19.00%26.86%-0.71%6.98%-12.87%15.76%-10.65%
ESNB.DE
Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF
-7.20%0.82%0.78%2.90%-8.70%5.74%-3.42%5.43%-7.45%

Correlation

The correlation between AMES.DE and ESNB.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2018

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ESNB.DE
ESNB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ESNB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESNB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESNB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESNB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESNB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF (ESNB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMES.DEESNB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.91

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

-0.49

+4.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.26

-1.05

+16.31

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the ESNB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMES.DE and ESNB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMES.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.98%, which is greater than ESNB.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMES.DE and ESNB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMES.DEESNB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.98%

-22.77%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-10.40%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-12.60%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-15.85%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-13.87%

+11.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-8.44%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

4.88%

-2.06%

Volatility

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF (ESNB.DE) at 3.07%. This indicates that AMES.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESNB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMES.DEESNB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

3.07%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

6.22%

+8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

9.76%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

10.53%

+6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

12.11%

+6.22%

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMES.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ESNB.DE's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMES.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMES.DE nor ESNB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMES.DE and ESNB.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMES.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMES.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for ESNB.DE.

AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain, while ESNB.DE tracks BELEX15 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Expat. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMES.DE and 1.38% for ESNB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMES.DE and ESNB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer