PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A (DEAM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMES.DE achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than DEAM.DE's 3.95% return.


AMES.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
7.06%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.44%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
32.90%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
13.44%

DEAM.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
3.95%
6M
5.04%
1Y
6.32%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
-1.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
14.53%55.41%19.00%26.86%-0.71%6.98%-12.87%11.06%
DEAM.DE
Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A
3.95%19.33%-6.04%7.34%-28.80%13.67%8.06%20.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AMES.DE and DEAM.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2019

0.67

The correlation between AMES.DE and DEAM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DEAM.DE
DEAM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DEAM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEAM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEAM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DEAM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEAM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A (DEAM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMES.DEDEAM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.07

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

0.42

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.40

1.19

+15.21

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the DEAM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMES.DE and DEAM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMES.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.98%, roughly equal to the maximum DEAM.DE drawdown of -40.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMES.DE and DEAM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMES.DEDEAM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.98%

-40.04%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-14.95%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-18.48%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-40.04%

+22.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-13.72%

+13.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-16.21%

+6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

5.31%

-2.49%

Volatility

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) is 4.04%, while Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A (DEAM.DE) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that AMES.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEAM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMES.DEDEAM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

5.05%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.99%

15.72%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.47%

18.59%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

19.34%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

19.58%

-1.16%

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMES.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DEAM.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AMES.DE vs. DEAM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMES.DE nor DEAM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMES.DE and DEAM.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DEAM.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DEAM.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMES.DE.

AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain, while DEAM.DE tracks MDAX®. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMES.DE and 0.19% for DEAM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMES.DE and DEAM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer