PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMES.DE vs. C030.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMES.DE achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly higher than C030.DE's 4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, AMES.DE has outperformed C030.DE with an annualized return of 11.05%, while C030.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.19% annualized return.


AMES.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.00%
6M
10.82%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
11.05%

C030.DE

1D
0.98%
1M
2.51%
YTD
4.27%
6M
7.62%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
7.00%55.41%19.00%25.94%0.03%6.96%-12.87%15.76%-12.77%11.84%
C030.DE
Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist
4.27%18.43%7.60%16.13%-13.47%31.43%4.07%33.96%-8.34%9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AMES.DE and C030.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2011

0.47

The correlation between AMES.DE and C030.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

C030.DE
C030.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
C030.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C030.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
C030.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
C030.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
C030.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMES.DEC030.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.20

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

4.12

+7.68

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the C030.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMES.DE and C030.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMES.DEC030.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.03

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.64

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.78

-0.30

Drawdowns

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMES.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.98%, which is greater than C030.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMES.DE and C030.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMES.DEC030.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.98%

-29.54%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-11.32%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-16.50%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-19.19%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

-29.54%

-11.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-2.40%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-5.24%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.30%

-0.43%

Volatility

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist (C030.DE) at 4.16%. This indicates that AMES.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C030.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMES.DEC030.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.16%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

10.20%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

13.16%

+3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

14.45%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

15.99%

+4.83%

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMES.DE and C030.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AMES.DE vs. C030.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMES.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while C030.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
C030.DE
Amundi DJ Switzerland Titans 30 UCITS ETF Dist
1.27%1.32%1.52%2.68%2.21%1.70%2.04%2.37%2.78%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMES.DE and C030.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMES.DE and C030.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain, while C030.DE tracks Dow Jones Switzerland Titans 30.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMES.DE and C030.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer