PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMES.DE achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly lower than AW1H.DE's 7.82% return.


AMES.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.00%
6M
10.82%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
11.05%

AW1H.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
4.98%
YTD
7.82%
6M
10.03%
1Y
17.51%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
7.00%55.41%19.00%25.94%0.03%-1.17%
AW1H.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
7.82%23.67%10.99%18.33%-14.28%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AMES.DE and AW1H.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021

0.71

The correlation between AMES.DE and AW1H.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AW1H.DE
AW1H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMES.DEAW1H.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.60

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

5.86

+5.94

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMES.DE and AW1H.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMES.DEAW1H.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.17

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Drawdowns

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMES.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.98%, which is greater than AW1H.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMES.DE and AW1H.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMES.DEAW1H.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.98%

-26.23%

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-10.92%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-15.54%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.81%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-5.74%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.98%

-0.11%

Volatility

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMES.DEAW1H.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.49%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

12.32%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

14.97%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

16.76%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

16.76%

+4.06%

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMES.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1H.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AMES.DE vs. AW1H.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMES.DE nor AW1H.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMES.DE and AW1H.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AW1H.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW1H.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMES.DE.

AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain, while AW1H.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMES.DE and 0.12% for AW1H.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMES.DE and AW1H.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer