AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE
AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and WDNR.DE (Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Energy Equities funds from Amundi - AMEE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG while WDNR.DE tracks the Bloomberg BioEnergy ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE returned 15.13%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for WDNR.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEE.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WDNR.DE.
Performance
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEE.DE achieves a 27.83% return, which is significantly lower than WDNR.DE's 32.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE has outperformed WDNR.DE with an annualized return of 15.13%, while WDNR.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.68% annualized return.
AMEE.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 27.83%
- 6M
- 26.99%
- 1Y
- 61.42%
- 3Y*
- 32.97%
- 5Y*
- 28.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
WDNR.DE
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 32.56%
- 6M
- 30.95%
- 1Y
- 52.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 15.63%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 27.83% | 37.58% | 15.56% | 12.19% | 35.81% | 34.64% | -31.29% | 10.32% | -0.78% | 5.51% |
WDNR.DE Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 32.56% | 10.93% | -16.29% | -1.60% | 53.34% | 50.49% | -37.73% | 13.17% | -12.36% | -8.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEE.DE and WDNR.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2011 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMEE.DE and WDNR.DE has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEE.DE
WDNR.DE
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) and Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEE.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.52 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.71 | 5.91 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.88 | 24.02 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEE.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 3.01 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.71 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.28 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.25 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, smaller than the maximum WDNR.DE drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEE.DE and WDNR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEE.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -62.27% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -8.85% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.74% | -34.75% | +19.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -40.22% | +20.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.14% | -61.84% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -1.19% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -16.70% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.18% | +0.38% |
Volatility
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that AMEE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDNR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEE.DE | WDNR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 4.95% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 13.82% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 17.36% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 22.68% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 27.02% | -1.28% |
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than WDNR.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEE.DE vs. WDNR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEE.DE nor WDNR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEE.DE and WDNR.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDNR.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDNR.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AMEE.DE.
AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG, while WDNR.DE tracks Bloomberg BioEnergy ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AMEE.DE and 0.35% for WDNR.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEE.DE and WDNR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer