PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds from Amundi - AMEE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG while LYM9.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE returned 15.13%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for LYM9.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEE.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LYM9.DE.

Performance

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEE.DE achieves a 27.83% return, which is significantly lower than LYM9.DE's 37.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE has outperformed LYM9.DE with an annualized return of 15.13%, while LYM9.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.14% annualized return.

AMEE.DE

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
27.83%
6M
26.99%
1Y
61.42%
3Y*
32.97%
5Y*
28.59%
10Y*
15.13%

LYM9.DE

1D
-2.36%
1M
1.36%
YTD
37.23%
6M
37.66%
1Y
74.23%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMEE.DE
Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc		27.83%37.58%15.56%12.19%35.81%34.64%-31.29%10.32%-0.78%5.51%
LYM9.DE
Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist		37.23%29.63%-7.97%-21.17%-13.14%1.12%46.11%50.04%-9.16%15.64%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEE.DE and LYM9.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2011

0.52

Over the past year, AMEE.DE and LYM9.DE have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc

Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist

Often compared with AMEE.DE:
AMEE.DE vs. EQQQ.DEAMEE.DE vs. ANRJ.LAMEE.DE vs. BNKE.LAMEE.DE vs. SXRT.DEAMEE.DE vs. AME6.DEAMEE.DE vs. IUES.LAMEE.DE vs. REMX
Often compared with LYM9.DE:
LYM9.DE vs. IQQH.DELYM9.DE vs. LOGS.DELYM9.DE vs. NRJL.LLYM9.DE vs. URTHLYM9.DE vs. WNDY.DELYM9.DE vs. G1CE.DELYM9.DE vs. SMLP.DE

Return for Risk

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AMEE.DE
AMEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AMEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
LYM9.DE
LYM9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LYM9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYM9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYM9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LYM9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYM9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AMEE.DELYM9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.24
3.65

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.17
4.46

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.59

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.71

9.45

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.88

31.90

-8.02

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is comparable to the LYM9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEE.DE and LYM9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AMEE.DELYM9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

3.65

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

0.16

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.51

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.05

+0.36

Drawdowns

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, smaller than the maximum LYM9.DE drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEE.DE and LYM9.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AMEE.DELYM9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.14%

-72.01%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-7.81%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-41.61%

+25.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-55.00%

+35.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.14%

-55.00%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-2.77%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-42.85%

+32.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.32%

+0.24%

Volatility

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) is 7.10%, while Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that AMEE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYM9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AMEE.DELYM9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

7.97%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

15.84%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.89%

20.25%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.25%

22.20%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

21.82%

+3.92%

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LYM9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMEE.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMEE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYM9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEE.DE
Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYM9.DE
Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist		0.31%0.42%0.74%0.78%0.25%0.31%0.70%1.12%0.67%0.89%1.50%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

AMEE.DE and LYM9.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM9.DE.

AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG, while LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AMEE.DE and 0.60% for LYM9.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEE.DE and LYM9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer