AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE
AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEE.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG, while ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMEE.DE returned 59.52% vs 30.75% for ENTR.DE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEE.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ENTR.DE.
Performance
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEE.DE achieves a 25.34% return, which is significantly higher than ENTR.DE's 6.68% return.
AMEE.DE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 25.34%
- 6M
- 26.10%
- 1Y
- 59.52%
- 3Y*
- 32.29%
- 5Y*
- 27.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 25.34% | 32.24% |
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.68% | 11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEE.DE and ENTR.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEE.DE
ENTR.DE
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEE.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.33 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.46 | 3.18 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.23 | 10.08 | +10.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEE.DE and ENTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEE.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -13.89% | -45.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -9.72% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -7.86% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -4.89% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.06% | -0.13% |
Volatility
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) at 3.87%. This indicates that AMEE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEE.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 3.87% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.61% | 14.17% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.39% | 17.01% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 16.34% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 16.34% | +9.25% |
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEE.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEE.DE nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEE.DE and ENTR.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
AMEE.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ENTR.DE is Commodities. AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AMEE.DE and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEE.DE and ENTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer