PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEC.DE achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than JPGL.DE's 11.57% return.


AMEC.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
10.78%
YTD
30.58%
6M
29.29%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*

JPGL.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.07%
YTD
11.57%
6M
12.21%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AMEC.DE
Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF
30.58%9.65%16.27%1.43%-18.74%9.30%9.10%3.62%
JPGL.DE
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
11.57%5.18%16.53%9.74%-4.98%33.79%-3.55%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEC.DE and JPGL.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.71

The correlation between AMEC.DE and JPGL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEC.DE
AMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JPGL.DE
JPGL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMEC.DEJPGL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.09

4.10

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.11

15.50

+0.61

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEC.DE and JPGL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMEC.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.28

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.85

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.68

-0.24

Drawdowns

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, roughly equal to the maximum JPGL.DE drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEC.DE and JPGL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEC.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-35.55%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-4.75%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-17.34%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.33%

-17.34%

-9.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.10%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-4.81%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

1.26%

+1.60%

Volatility

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE) at 2.06%. This indicates that AMEC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPGL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEC.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

2.06%

+4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

6.02%

+7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

8.55%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

11.86%

+5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

15.01%

+4.21%

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEC.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JPGL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMEC.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMEC.DE nor JPGL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMEC.DE and JPGL.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPGL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPGL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AMEC.DE.

AMEC.DE tracks Solactive Smart City, while JPGL.DE tracks JP Morgan Diversified Factor Global Developed (Region Aware) Equity. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AMEC.DE and 0.20% for JPGL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEC.DE and JPGL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer