PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AME vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AME vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMETEK, Inc. (AME) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AME achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.


AME

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
10.80%
6M
12.76%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
17.87%

PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-5.33%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AME vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
10.80%14.66%10.01%18.81%-4.33%22.32%21.26%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AME and PLTR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.27

The correlation between AME and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AME:

$52.20B

PLTR:

$329.05B

EPS

AME:

$6.62

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

AME:

34.32

PLTR:

144.03

PEG Ratio

AME:

3.20

PLTR:

0.84

PS Ratio

AME:

6.90

PLTR:

62.90

PB Ratio

AME:

4.36

PLTR:

38.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

AME:

$7.60B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AME:

$2.06B

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

AME:

$2.15B

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AME vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AME
AME Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AME Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AME Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AME vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMETEK, Inc. (AME) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMEPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.03

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

-0.14

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

-0.25

+6.60

AME vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AME Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AME and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AME vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AME drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AME and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.31%

-84.62%

+31.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-38.22%

+24.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-40.61%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-79.14%

+52.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-38.22%

+32.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-40.27%

+28.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

21.23%

-16.96%

Volatility

AME vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMETEK, Inc. (AME) is 6.77%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that AME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

17.16%

-10.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

38.32%

-21.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.18%

50.83%

-28.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

65.44%

-43.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.44%

69.75%

-45.31%

Dividends

AME vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

AME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
0.56%0.60%0.62%0.61%0.63%0.54%0.60%0.56%0.83%0.50%0.74%0.67%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AME vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMETEK, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.93B
1.63B
(AME) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AME vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AMETEK, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
86.8%
Portfolio components
AME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

AME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported an operating income of 514.94M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

AME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a net income of 399.36M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AME and PLTR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to AME (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AME dropped -53.31% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

AME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AME and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer