AMD vs. PPFB.DE

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.) is a stock, while PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Over the past 3 years, AMD returned 60.16%/yr vs 31.53%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMD vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AMD is traded in USD, while PPFB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PPFB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMD achieves a 138.87% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 1.54% return.

AMD

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: 14.83%
• YTD: 138.87%
• 6M: 142.70%
• 1Y: 331.70%
• 3Y*: 60.16%
• 5Y*: 44.46%
• 10Y*: 60.93%

PPFB.DE

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.85%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 31.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMD vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.	138.87%	77.30%	-18.06%	127.59%	-54.99%	65.54%
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC	1.54%	68.33%	26.50%	12.88%	1.14%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AMD and PPFB.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.10

Return for Risk

AMD vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMD

AMD Risk / Return Rank: 98
AMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
AMD Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMD Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PPFB.DE

PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 36
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMD vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMD	PPFB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.01	1.33	+3.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	1.77	+2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.25	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.04	1.87	+10.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.74	4.78	+19.96

AMD vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMD Sharpe Ratio is 5.01, which is higher than the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMD and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMD vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMD drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMD and PPFB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMD	PPFB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.59%	-21.42%	-75.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.76%	-17.21%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.00%	-17.21%	-45.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.70%	-15.63%	+9.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.65%	-5.42%	-51.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.48%	6.76%	+6.72%

Volatility

AMD vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) has a higher volatility of 22.71% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 5.67%. This indicates that AMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMD	PPFB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.71%	5.67%	+17.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.12%	21.08%	+29.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.74%	24.30%	+42.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.71%	17.39%	+38.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.99%	17.39%	+39.60%

Dividends

AMD vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMD nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMD and PPFB.DE in my portfolio?

AMD and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.