PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
4.61%113.79%29.88%
PSLV.TO
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
4.64%134.39%37.19%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMAX.TO having a 4.61% return and PSLV.TO slightly higher at 4.64%.


AMAX.TO

1D
5.62%
1M
-18.54%
YTD
4.61%
6M
13.47%
1Y
68.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSLV.TO

1D
7.59%
1M
-19.23%
YTD
4.64%
6M
55.77%
1Y
103.35%
3Y*
44.61%
5Y*
24.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX.TO
AMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLV.TO
PSLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PSLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAX.TOPSLV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.90

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.07

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.67

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.13

8.30

+0.83

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the PSLV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX.TO and PSLV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAX.TOPSLV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.90

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.96

0.55

+1.41

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX.TO and PSLV.TO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Dividend Comparison

AMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, while PSLV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
6.91%7.11%11.22%
PSLV.TO
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum PSLV.TO drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX.TO and PSLV.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAX.TOPSLV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-41.53%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.60%

-39.47%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.54%

-31.06%

+12.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-15.35%

+10.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.74%

12.69%

-4.95%

Volatility

AMAX.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) is 16.54%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) has a volatility of 20.13%. This indicates that AMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMAX.TOPSLV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.54%

20.13%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.06%

54.40%

-21.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.73%

54.75%

-15.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.11%

32.57%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.11%

37.03%

-3.92%