ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ALTN.L (AltynGold plc) is a stock, while XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Over the past 10 years, ALTN.L returned 17.17%/yr vs 27.22%/yr for XLKQ.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in AltynGold plc (ALTN.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTN.L achieves a -19.03% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ALTN.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 17.17%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.22% annualized return.

ALTN.L

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -9.50%
• YTD: -19.03%
• 6M: -1.96%
• 1Y: 143.90%
• 3Y*: 108.08%
• 5Y*: 45.47%
• 10Y*: 17.17%

XLKQ.L

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 14.41%
• YTD: 23.81%
• 6M: 22.31%
• 1Y: 54.52%
• 3Y*: 33.18%
• 5Y*: 26.60%
• 10Y*: 27.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALTN.L AltynGold plc	-19.03%	546.60%	80.19%	28.48%	-27.95%	0.66%	121.95%	-10.87%	-53.44%	-33.24%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	23.81%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-20.58%	36.28%	37.93%	44.63%	0.92%	23.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTN.L and XLKQ.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014	0.03

Return for Risk

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTN.L

ALTN.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
ALTN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ALTN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ALTN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ALTN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ALTN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AltynGold plc (ALTN.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALTN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.83	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.59	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.46	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.24	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	8.42	-0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTN.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTN.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALTN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.83	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	1.21	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	1.33	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	1.33	-1.30

Drawdowns

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTN.L drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTN.L and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALTN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.52%	-28.74%	-69.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.18%	-16.76%	-28.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.18%	-28.74%	-16.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.83%	-28.74%	-24.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.43%	-28.74%	-56.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.44%	-2.84%	-51.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.58%	-5.04%	-70.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.74%	6.45%	+11.29%

Volatility

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

AltynGold plc (ALTN.L) has a higher volatility of 19.14% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 6.83%. This indicates that ALTN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALTN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.14%	6.83%	+12.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.58%	14.29%	+36.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.49%	19.18%	+50.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.71%	22.04%	+39.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.08%	21.65%	+60.43%

Dividends

ALTN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALTN.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALTN.L and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

ALTN.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.