ALSCX vs. VRTGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Small Cap Growth Fund (ALSCX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX).
ALSCX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 11, 1986. VRTGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Performance
ALSCX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALSCX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSCX Alger Small Cap Growth Fund | -12.11% | 7.80% | 9.47% | 16.25% | -37.61% | -3.35% | 63.82% | 28.12% | 1.20% | 25.24% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | -6.77% | 12.97% | 15.26% | 18.80% | -26.30% | 2.82% | 34.81% | 28.84% | -9.21% | 22.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALSCX achieves a -12.11% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ALSCX has underperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 8.31%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.
ALSCX
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -11.99%
- YTD
- -12.11%
- 6M
- -9.73%
- 1Y
- 16.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- -6.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
VRTGX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALSCX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALSCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALSCX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank
ALSCX
VRTGX
ALSCX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Small Cap Growth Fund (ALSCX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALSCX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.71 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 1.15 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 1.02 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 3.52 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALSCX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.71 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.03 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.39 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.45 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALSCX and VRTGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ALSCX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison
ALSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSCX Alger Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.11% | 0.67% | 8.26% | 17.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.77% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 0.78% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.90% | 0.85% | 0.75% | 1.07% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
ALSCX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALSCX drawdown since its inception was -76.39%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSCX and VRTGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALSCX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.39% | -41.97% | -34.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.23% | -14.80% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.13% | -40.48% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.16% | -41.97% | -11.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.16% | -14.80% | -23.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -10.53% | -24.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 4.30% | +1.08% |
Volatility
ALSCX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Small Cap Growth Fund (ALSCX) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) at 7.60%. This indicates that ALSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALSCX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.34% | 7.60% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.59% | 16.04% | +1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.47% | 25.09% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.81% | 24.47% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.51% | 24.41% | +1.10% |