ALMAX vs. AAICX
ALMAX (Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund) and AAICX (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C) are both mutual funds - ALMAX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger, while AAICX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past year, ALMAX returned 12.92% vs 64.10% for AAICX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALMAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for AAICX.
Performance
ALMAX vs. AAICX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALMAX achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than AAICX's 27.53% return.
ALMAX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- -3.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
AAICX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 13.63%
- YTD
- 27.53%
- 6M
- 27.30%
- 1Y
- 64.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALMAX vs. AAICX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ALMAX Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund | 4.73% | 0.50% | 11.23% |
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C | 27.53% | 39.54% | 32.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALMAX and AAICX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ALMAX and AAICX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALMAX vs. AAICX — Risk / Return Rank
ALMAX
AAICX
ALMAX vs. AAICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALMAX | AAICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 2.99 | -2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 3.57 | -2.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.46 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 3.73 | -3.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 11.26 | -9.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALMAX | AAICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.99 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.82 | -1.49 |
Drawdowns
ALMAX vs. AAICX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALMAX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than AAICX's maximum drawdown of -29.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMAX and AAICX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALMAX | AAICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.51% | -29.07% | -31.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.91% | -17.87% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.00% | 0.00% | -32.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.33% | -5.08% | -12.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 5.90% | +0.93% |
Volatility
ALMAX vs. AAICX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) at 5.25%. This indicates that ALMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALMAX | AAICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 5.25% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 16.75% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.71% | 22.31% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 27.41% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.26% | 27.41% | -0.15% |
ALMAX vs. AAICX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALMAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AAICX's 1.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALMAX vs. AAICX - Dividend Comparison
ALMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C | 5.05% | 6.44% | 4.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALMAX Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.48% | 4.64% | 4.00% | 9.86% | 0.00% | 12.44% | 55.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALMAX and AAICX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALMAX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to AAICX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMAX dropped -60.51% vs AAICX's -29.07%.
AAICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALMAX and AAICX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer