PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALMAX vs. AAICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMAX achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than AAICX's 27.53% return.


ALMAX

1D
0.69%
1M
5.95%
YTD
4.73%
6M
3.25%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
-3.52%
10Y*
8.75%

AAICX

1D
0.14%
1M
13.63%
YTD
27.53%
6M
27.30%
1Y
64.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALMAX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund
4.73%0.50%11.23%
AAICX
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C
27.53%39.54%32.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMAX and AAICX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024

0.62

The correlation between ALMAX and AAICX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALMAX vs. AAICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMAX
ALMAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ALMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AAICX
AAICX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALMAXAAICXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

2.99

-2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

3.57

-2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

3.73

-3.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.14

11.26

-9.12

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the AAICX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMAX and AAICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALMAXAAICXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.99

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

1.82

-1.49

Drawdowns

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMAX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than AAICX's maximum drawdown of -29.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMAX and AAICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALMAXAAICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.51%

-29.07%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-17.87%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.00%

0.00%

-32.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-5.08%

-12.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

5.90%

+0.93%

Volatility

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) at 5.25%. This indicates that ALMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALMAXAAICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

5.25%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

16.75%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.71%

22.31%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.17%

27.41%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.26%

27.41%

-0.15%

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALMAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AAICX's 1.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALMAX vs. AAICX - Dividend Comparison

ALMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAICX
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C
5.05%6.44%4.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ALMAX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.48%4.64%4.00%9.86%0.00%12.44%55.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALMAX and AAICX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALMAX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to AAICX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMAX dropped -60.51% vs AAICX's -29.07%.

AAICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALMAX and AAICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer