ALGS vs. UBER

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

ALGS (Aligos Therapeutics, Inc.) and UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. ALGS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while UBER operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ALGS returned -57.85%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for UBER. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ALGS vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALGS achieves a -43.35% return, which is significantly lower than UBER's -11.68% return.

ALGS

• 1D: -8.01%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: -33.50%
• YTD: -43.35%
• 1Y: -42.36%
• 3Y*: -39.53%
• 5Y*: -57.85%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -53.52%

UBER

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: -14.94%
• YTD: -11.68%
• 1Y: -20.33%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALGS vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALGS Aligos Therapeutics, Inc.	-43.35%	-76.61%	140.00%	-30.32%	-91.97%	-57.07%	58.91%
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc.	-11.68%	35.46%	-2.03%	148.97%	-41.02%	-17.78%	48.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ALGS and UBER is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020	0.19

The correlation between ALGS and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALGS : $32.67M UBER : $146.91B
EPS ALGS : -$8.70 UBER : $4.07
PS Ratio ALGS : 29.25 UBER : 2.82
PB Ratio ALGS : 1.73 UBER : 6.04
Total Revenue (TTM) ALGS : $1.88M UBER : $53.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) ALGS : $1.36M UBER : $22.03B
EBITDA (TTM) ALGS : -$94.69M UBER : $5.85B

Return for Risk

ALGS vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALGS

ALGS Risk / Return Rank: 22
ALGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ALGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ALGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ALGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ALGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

UBER

UBER Risk / Return Rank: 20
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 20
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALGS vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALGS	UBER	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	-0.60	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.40	-0.72	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.92	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	-0.65	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.10	-1.04	-0.06

ALGS vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is comparable to the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALGS and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALGS vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALGS drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALGS and UBER.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALGS	UBER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.54%	-68.05%	-31.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.07%	-31.46%	-31.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-91.25%	-31.46%	-59.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.10%	-57.69%	-41.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.40%	-27.90%	-71.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.37%	-25.69%	-58.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.59%	19.64%	+18.95%

Volatility

ALGS vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS) has a higher volatility of 21.06% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 11.96%. This indicates that ALGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALGS	UBER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.06%	11.96%	+9.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.17%	25.18%	+28.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.71%	33.85%	+46.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	99.31%	45.04%	+54.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.89%	50.53%	+49.36%

Dividends

ALGS vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALGS nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALGS and UBER in my portfolio?

ALGS and UBER have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALGS or UBER?

ALGS has higher volatility (21.06%) compared to UBER (11.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALGS dropped -99.54% vs UBER's -68.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.