ALAI vs. PBOT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ALAI (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ALAI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.

Performance

ALAI vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAI achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly lower than PBOT's 26.50% return.

ALAI

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 22.67%
• YTD: 22.63%
• 1Y: 40.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 42.22%

PBOT

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: 24.01%
• YTD: 26.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	$3.00M	$4.32M	$4.07M
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	$30.33K	$29.64K	$24.21K

ALAI vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	22.63%	-1.79%
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	26.50%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAI and PBOT is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

ALAI vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ALAI

ALAI Risk / Return Rank: 56
ALAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ALAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ALAI Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ALAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ALAI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

PBOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ALAI vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALAI	PBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.16	—	—

Drawdowns

ALAI vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAI drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAI and PBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALAI	PBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.36%	-15.78%	-13.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.28%	-6.04%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-4.52%	-0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALAI	PBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.55%	26.96%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.15%	26.96%	+2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.15%	26.96%	+2.19%

ALAI vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALAI vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison

ALAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than PBOT's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	1.22%	1.50%	0.66%
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	0.08%	0.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALAI and PBOT in my portfolio?

ALAI and PBOT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALAI or PBOT?

On fees, ALAI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALAI or PBOT?

ALAI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALAI or PBOT?

ALAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.08% for PBOT.

What is the main difference between ALAI and PBOT?

They also come from different issuers: Alger and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ALAI and 0.70% for PBOT.