PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAI vs. MBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAI vs. MBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAI achieves a 23.84% return, which is significantly higher than MBSX's 5.41% return.


ALAI

1D
-3.08%
1M
2.64%
YTD
23.84%
6M
21.16%
1Y
55.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MBSX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.91%
YTD
5.41%
6M
5.11%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAI vs. MBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ALAI
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
23.84%54.54%
MBSX
Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF
5.41%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAI and MBSX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAI vs. MBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAI
ALAI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ALAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

MBSX
MBSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAI vs. MBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALAIMBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.12

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

0.36

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

1.15

+7.79

ALAI vs. MBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the MBSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAI and MBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAI vs. MBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAI drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, which is greater than MBSX's maximum drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAI and MBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAIMBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.36%

-27.57%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.48%

-27.57%

+8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-21.16%

+16.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-6.78%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

8.50%

-2.31%

Volatility

ALAI vs. MBSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) is 11.00%, while Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) has a volatility of 41.28%. This indicates that ALAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAIMBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

41.28%

-30.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.54%

52.02%

-31.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.98%

54.80%

-28.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.89%

54.59%

-25.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.89%

54.59%

-25.70%

ALAI vs. MBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALAI vs. MBSX - Dividend Comparison

ALAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than MBSX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ALAI
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
1.21%1.50%0.66%
MBSX
Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF
3.38%2.77%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAI and MBSX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSX has higher volatility (41.28%) compared to ALAI (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAI dropped -29.36% vs MBSX's -27.57%.

On 1-year performance, ALAI leads with 55.24% vs 9.78% for MBSX. On fees, MBSX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ALAI has been the lower-risk option at 11.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ALAI has performed better with a 55.24% return vs 9.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBSX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ALAI.

MBSX has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 1.21% for ALAI.

ALAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while MBSX is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Alger and Regan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ALAI and 0.40% for MBSX.

ALAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAI and MBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer