ALAI vs. FBCG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG).

ALAI and FBCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ALAI is an actively managed fund by Alger. It was launched on Apr 4, 2024. FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.

Performance

ALAI vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALAI vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	-8.50%	39.81%	31.43%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	-8.61%	18.60%	20.87%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ALAI having a -8.50% return and FBCG slightly lower at -8.61%.

ALAI

• 1D: 6.27%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: -8.50%
• 6M: -10.52%
• 1Y: 46.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -8.61%
• 6M: -6.56%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAI vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

FBCG

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

ALAI

Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF

Return for Risk

ALAI vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAI

ALAI Risk / Return Rank: 80
ALAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ALAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ALAI Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ALAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ALAI Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 64
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAI vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALAI	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	0.97	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.54	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.22	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	1.65	+0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.44	5.92	+1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALAI vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAI and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALAI	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	0.97	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.67	+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between ALAI and FBCG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ALAI vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

ALAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	1.64%	1.50%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Drawdowns

ALAI vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAI drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAI and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALAI	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.36%	-43.56%	+14.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.48%	-15.17%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.43%	-11.09%	-3.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-11.79%	+6.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.09%	4.23%	+1.86%

Volatility

ALAI vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 8.22%. This indicates that ALAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALAI	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.21%	8.22%	+2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.07%	14.74%	+4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.55%	26.28%	+4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.80%	25.82%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.80%	25.92%	+2.88%