PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAI vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAI vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAI achieves a 22.29% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 23.84% return.


ALAI

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.80%
6M
18.33%
YTD
22.29%
1Y
45.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
-3.81%
1M
-2.41%
6M
34.02%
YTD
23.84%
1Y
64.31%
3Y*
-31.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAI vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAI
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
22.29%39.81%32.38%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
23.84%-1.76%-35.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAI and BITI is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2024

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAI vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAI
ALAI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ALAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAI vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALAIBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.56

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

6.37

+0.85

ALAI vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAI and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALAI vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAI drawdown since its inception was -29.36%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAI and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAIBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.36%

-92.16%

+62.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.48%

-25.28%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-86.48%

+80.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-68.36%

+63.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

10.13%

-3.84%

Volatility

ALAI vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) is 10.17%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that ALAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAIBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

11.73%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.27%

34.49%

-13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.44%

44.24%

-17.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

52.29%

-23.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.86%

52.29%

-23.43%

ALAI vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALAI vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

ALAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than BITI's 15.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ALAI
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
1.23%1.50%0.66%0.00%0.00%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.70%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAI and BITI have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to ALAI (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAI dropped -29.36% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.31% vs 45.29% for ALAI. On fees, ALAI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ALAI has been the lower-risk option at 10.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.31% return vs 45.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ALAI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.70%, compared with 1.23% for ALAI.

ALAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Alger and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ALAI and 1.03% for BITI.

ALAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAI and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer