PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF (SC04.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ALAG.L is traded in GBp, while SC04.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SC04.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAG.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than SC04.DE's -11.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ALAG.L has outperformed SC04.DE with an annualized return of 8.49%, while SC04.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.40% annualized return.


ALAG.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
10.55%
6M
7.97%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
8.49%

SC04.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
2.58%
YTD
-11.39%
6M
-11.35%
1Y
-1.58%
3Y*
0.02%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
5.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
10.55%44.31%-25.31%25.10%21.74%-8.24%-16.56%12.56%-1.55%12.30%
SC04.DE
Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF
-11.39%13.17%2.41%6.32%-6.07%10.95%12.56%22.76%-15.00%18.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAG.L and SC04.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.37

The correlation between ALAG.L and SC04.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SC04.DE
SC04.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SC04.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC04.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF (SC04.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALAG.LSC04.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.00

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

-0.10

+3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

-0.23

+11.05

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the SC04.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAG.L and SC04.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALAG.LSC04.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

-0.10

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.06

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.32

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.58

-0.18

Drawdowns

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, which is greater than SC04.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAG.L and SC04.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAG.LSC04.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-25.18%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-15.89%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-15.93%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-22.08%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.94%

-25.18%

-23.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-13.57%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-5.51%

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

6.89%

-3.33%

Volatility

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) is 4.67%, while Invesco European Household Sector UCITS ETF (SC04.DE) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that ALAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC04.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAG.LSC04.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.33%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

13.54%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

16.50%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

17.30%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

16.95%

+7.94%

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SC04.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ALAG.L vs. SC04.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAG.L nor SC04.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAG.L and SC04.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC04.DE.

ALAG.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while SC04.DE is Consumer Staples Equities. ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while SC04.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Personal & Household Goods. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ALAG.L and 0.20% for SC04.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAG.L and SC04.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer