ALAG.L vs. COFF.L
ALAG.L (Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD) and COFF.L (WisdomTree Coffee) are both exchange-traded funds - ALAG.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while COFF.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Coffee. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ALAG.L returned 8.49%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for COFF.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ALAG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COFF.L.
Performance
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ALAG.L is traded in GBp, while COFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COFF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAG.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than COFF.L's -25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ALAG.L has outperformed COFF.L with an annualized return of 8.49%, while COFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
ALAG.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 7.97%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
COFF.L
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- YTD
- -25.95%
- 6M
- -31.86%
- 1Y
- -16.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- 18.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAG.L Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD | 10.55% | 44.31% | -25.31% | 25.10% | 21.74% | -8.24% | -16.56% | 12.56% | -1.55% | 12.30% |
COFF.L WisdomTree Coffee | -25.95% | 20.62% | 77.97% | 18.30% | -11.58% | 64.66% | -14.83% | 9.37% | -22.80% | -24.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAG.L and COFF.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ALAG.L and COFF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ALAG.L
COFF.L
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Basic Materials
ALAG.L
COFF.L
Energy
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Industrials
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Utilities
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Communication Services
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Real Estate
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Healthcare
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Technology
ALAG.L
COFF.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L — Risk / Return Rank
ALAG.L
COFF.L
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALAG.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.95 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | -0.46 | +4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | -0.92 | +11.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALAG.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | -0.48 | +2.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.55 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.17 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.02 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum COFF.L drawdown of -84.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAG.L and COFF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAG.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | -84.41% | +35.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -35.48% | +24.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -37.56% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -42.49% | +16.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.94% | -64.65% | +15.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.63% | -50.01% | +39.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -53.57% | +41.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 17.71% | -14.15% |
Volatility
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) is 4.67%, while WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that ALAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALAG.L | COFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 8.60% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 21.58% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 34.18% | -16.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 34.93% | -14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 31.97% | -7.08% |
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than COFF.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALAG.L vs. COFF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAG.L nor COFF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALAG.L and COFF.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COFF.L.
ALAG.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while COFF.L is Agricultural Commodities. ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ALAG.L and 0.49% for COFF.L.
Find the right allocation for ALAG.L and COFF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer