PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ALAG.L is traded in GBp, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAG.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ALAG.L has underperformed ANXU.L with an annualized return of 8.49%, while ANXU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.69% annualized return.


ALAG.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
10.55%
6M
7.97%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
8.49%

ANXU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
10.24%
YTD
20.95%
6M
19.24%
1Y
42.83%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
22.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
10.55%44.31%-25.31%25.10%21.74%-8.24%-16.56%12.56%-1.55%12.30%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
20.15%11.32%28.95%48.68%-25.30%28.68%41.33%36.74%4.00%20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAG.L and ANXU.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.32

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALAG.L
ANXU.L

Financial Services

30.3%
0.2%

Basic Materials

19.7%
1.1%

Energy

11.7%
0.6%

Industrials

10.8%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
7.7%

Utilities

8.5%
1.4%

Communication Services

4.0%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
12.2%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

1.4%
4.2%

Technology

0.7%
53.7%

Financial Services

ALAG.L
30.3%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

ALAG.L
19.7%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Energy

ALAG.L
11.7%
ANXU.L
0.6%

Industrials

ALAG.L
10.8%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

ALAG.L
9.9%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Utilities

ALAG.L
8.5%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Communication Services

ALAG.L
4.0%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ALAG.L
1.6%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Real Estate

ALAG.L
1.6%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Healthcare

ALAG.L
1.4%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Technology

ALAG.L
0.7%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALAG.LANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.83

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

10.84

-0.01

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAG.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALAG.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.68

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.96

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

1.23

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.30

-0.90

Drawdowns

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAG.L and ANXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAG.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-27.52%

-21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-11.12%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-24.28%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-27.52%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.94%

-27.52%

-21.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

0.00%

-10.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-4.99%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.94%

-0.38%

Volatility

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) is 4.67%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that ALAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAG.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.02%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

11.74%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

15.89%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

20.08%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

21.15%

+3.74%

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ALAG.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAG.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAG.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.

ALAG.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ALAG.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAG.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer