AKO-B vs. MSA.TO
AKO-B (Embotelladora Andina S.A) and MSA.TO (Mineros S.A.) are both stocks. AKO-B operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while MSA.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, AKO-B returned 30.33%/yr vs 125.40%/yr for MSA.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AKO-B is traded in USD, while MSA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MSA.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKO-B achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than MSA.TO's 3.95% return.
AKO-B
- 1D
- -4.69%
- 1M
- 9.77%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 17.31%
- 3Y*
- 30.33%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
MSA.TO
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- 15.83%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 135.74%
- 3Y*
- 125.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-B Embotelladora Andina S.A | 5.24% | 62.01% | 31.46% | 12.77% | 34.54% | 6.27% |
MSA.TO Mineros S.A. | 3.95% | 319.47% | 139.15% | 9.63% | -36.36% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKO-B and MSA.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021 | 0.09 |
The correlation between AKO-B and MSA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AKO-B:
$4.30B
MSA.TO:
CA$1.75B
AKO-B:
$1.95K
MSA.TO:
CA$0.66
AKO-B:
0.01
MSA.TO:
8.92
AKO-B:
0.00
MSA.TO:
0.06
AKO-B:
0.00
MSA.TO:
1.86
AKO-B:
0.00
MSA.TO:
3.06
AKO-B:
$3.42T
MSA.TO:
CA$937.58M
AKO-B:
$1.34T
MSA.TO:
CA$403.36M
AKO-B:
$620.88B
MSA.TO:
CA$400.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AKO-B
MSA.TO
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-B) and Mineros S.A. (MSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AKO-B | MSA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 2.46 | -1.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 2.64 | -1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.35 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 3.23 | -2.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 8.32 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AKO-B | MSA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 2.46 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.02 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKO-B drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than MSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKO-B and MSA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKO-B | MSA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -53.24% | -22.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.20% | -42.31% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.27% | -42.31% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.92% | -24.41% | +12.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -20.32% | -11.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.57% | 16.37% | -5.80% |
Volatility
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-B) is 13.42%, while Mineros S.A. (MSA.TO) has a volatility of 19.22%. This indicates that AKO-B experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKO-B | MSA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.42% | 19.22% | -5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.76% | 41.84% | -17.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 55.77% | -21.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.75% | 53.86% | -14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 53.86% | -11.88% |
Dividends
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Dividend Comparison
AKO-B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than MSA.TO's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-B Embotelladora Andina S.A | 3.98% | 4.81% | 6.14% | 8.89% | 14.66% | 7.26% | 5.63% | 4.65% | 2.89% | 2.36% | 2.35% | 2.85% |
MSA.TO Mineros S.A. | 2.34% | 2.49% | 8.46% | 14.31% | 13.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Embotelladora Andina S.A and Mineros S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AKO-B vs. MSA.TO - Profitability Comparison
AKO-B - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a gross profit of 393.07B and revenue of 958.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
MSA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported a gross profit of 142.57M and revenue of 291.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.
AKO-B - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported an operating income of 147.46B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
MSA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported an operating income of 135.21M and revenue of 291.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
AKO-B - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a net income of 102.93B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
MSA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported a net income of 87.69M and revenue of 291.81M, resulting in a net margin of 30.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AKO-B and MSA.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AKO-B and MSA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer