PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AITFX vs. NJTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX) and T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AITFX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than NJTFX's 2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, AITFX has underperformed NJTFX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while NJTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.39% annualized return.


AITFX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.83%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
2.09%

NJTFX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.17%
YTD
2.11%
6M
2.81%
1Y
9.10%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AITFX
Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund
1.43%5.47%2.88%3.67%-2.62%0.57%3.73%4.35%1.13%2.69%
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
2.11%5.00%4.01%7.17%-10.24%2.67%4.73%6.65%1.31%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between AITFX and NJTFX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1991

0.79

The correlation between AITFX and NJTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AITFX vs. NJTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AITFX
AITFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AITFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AITFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AITFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
AITFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AITFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NJTFX
NJTFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NJTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NJTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX) and T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AITFXNJTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.00

1.92

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.52

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

13.33

-1.69

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AITFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the NJTFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AITFX and NJTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AITFX drawdown since its inception was -7.17%, smaller than the maximum NJTFX drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AITFX and NJTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AITFXNJTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-15.19%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-2.59%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.63%

-5.69%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.62%

-15.19%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.17%

-15.19%

+8.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-1.81%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.68%

-0.25%

Volatility

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX) is 0.49%, while T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) has a volatility of 0.71%. This indicates that AITFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NJTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AITFXNJTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.71%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

1.96%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

2.66%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.09%

3.99%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.18%

3.86%

-1.68%

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AITFX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than NJTFX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

AITFX vs. NJTFX - Dividend Comparison

AITFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than NJTFX's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AITFX
Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund
3.63%4.82%3.93%2.67%1.80%1.44%2.07%2.48%2.28%1.95%1.93%2.51%
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
4.44%4.44%4.27%3.27%2.03%2.56%2.79%2.84%3.13%3.13%3.26%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


AITFX and NJTFX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NJTFX has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to AITFX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AITFX dropped -7.17% vs NJTFX's -15.19%.

NJTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AITFX and NJTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer