AIS vs. TSXU
AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). AIS is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
AIS vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 117.05% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 144.17% return.
AIS
- 1D
- 4.29%
- 1M
- 34.88%
- YTD
- 117.05%
- 6M
- 121.69%
- 1Y
- 230.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- 5.69%
- 1M
- 70.75%
- YTD
- 144.17%
- 6M
- 129.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIS vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 117.05% | 4.95% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 144.17% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIS and TSXU is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIS vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
AIS
TSXU
AIS vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.44 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.04 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.22 | 4.66 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
AIS vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -35.62% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -10.61% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility
AIS vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.06% | 78.89% | -42.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.09% | 78.89% | -40.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.09% | 78.89% | -40.80% |
AIS vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIS vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.19% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIS and TSXU have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.
AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for AIS and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer