AIS vs. IEAA.L
AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and IEAA.L (iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares, while IEAA.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. AIS is actively managed, while IEAA.L is passively managed. Over the past year, AIS returned 190.00% vs 1.96% for IEAA.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IEAA.L.
Performance
AIS vs. IEAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AIS is traded in USD, while IEAA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEAA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 103.39% return, which is significantly higher than IEAA.L's -0.79% return.
AIS
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 8.29%
- YTD
- 103.39%
- 6M
- 110.47%
- 1Y
- 190.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEAA.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.85%
- 10Y*
- —
AIS vs. IEAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 103.39% | 58.35% | -4.74% |
IEAA.L iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.79% | 16.92% | -2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIS and IEAA.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIS vs. IEAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIS
IEAA.L
AIS vs. IEAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIS | IEAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.05 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.07 | 0.30 | +11.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.31 | 0.79 | +36.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIS vs. IEAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum IEAA.L drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and IEAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIS | IEAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -34.71% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -6.58% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -6.28% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -11.51% | +6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 2.47% | +2.65% |
Volatility
AIS vs. IEAA.L - Volatility Comparison
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 20.76% compared to iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) at 2.28%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIS | IEAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.76% | 2.28% | +18.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.25% | 5.92% | +28.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.44% | 7.69% | +31.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 9.36% | +30.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 8.80% | +31.06% |
AIS vs. IEAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IEAA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIS vs. IEAA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIS nor IEAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIS and IEAA.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEAA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEAA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while IEAA.L is European Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.20% for IEAA.L.
Find the right allocation for AIS and IEAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer