AIS vs. AGIQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. AIS is actively managed, while AGIQ is passively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AGIQ.

Performance

AIS vs. AGIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 68.71% return, which is significantly higher than AGIQ's 5.61% return.

AIS

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -14.16%
• 6M: 49.61%
• YTD: 68.71%
• 1Y: 119.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 75.75%

AGIQ

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -1.21%
• 6M: 6.78%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	$89.14K	$98.01K	$199.12K
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	$37.93M	$45.10M	$51.04M

AIS vs. AGIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	68.71%	25.87%
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	5.61%	13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and AGIQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025	0.68

AIS vs. AGIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIS	AGIQ
Technology	87.2%	56.0%
Industrials	6.8%	14.9%
Utilities	2.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.5%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	13.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Financial Services	-0.0%	-

Return for Risk

AIS vs. AGIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 87
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

AGIQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIS vs. AGIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIS	AGIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.91	—	—

Drawdowns

AIS vs. AGIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, which is greater than AGIQ's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and AGIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	AGIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.44%	-19.72%	-14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.93%	-6.46%	-21.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-6.27%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIS	AGIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.78%	23.79%	+23.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.01%	23.79%	+20.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.01%	23.79%	+20.22%

AIS vs. AGIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AGIQ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. AGIQ - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.

Position	TTM	2025
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	1.91%	0.38%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and AGIQ in my portfolio?

AIS and AGIQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIS or AGIQ?

On fees, AGIQ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or AGIQ?

AGIQ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or AGIQ?

AGIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIS and AGIQ?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.69% for AGIQ.