AIQG.L vs. SILG.L
AIQG.L (Global X Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - AIQG.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence Index, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIQG.L returned 67.13% vs 98.68% for SILG.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIQG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.
Performance
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIQG.L achieves a 33.58% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's 5.62% return.
AIQG.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 18.05%
- YTD
- 33.58%
- 6M
- 33.50%
- 1Y
- 67.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 98.68%
- 3Y*
- 45.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIQG.L Global X Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 33.58% | 21.73% | 17.14% |
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 5.62% | 153.98% | -2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIQG.L and SILG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIQG.L
SILG.L
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AIQG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIQG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.31 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 3.16 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 7.69 | +5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIQG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22 | 1.98 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.95 | 0.68 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIQG.L drawdown since its inception was -29.14%, smaller than the maximum SILG.L drawdown of -32.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQG.L and SILG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIQG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.14% | -32.00% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.94% | -30.90% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -24.56% | +22.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -12.52% | +7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.23% | 12.74% | -7.51% |
Volatility
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AIQG.L) is 7.62%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 18.48%. This indicates that AIQG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIQG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 18.48% | -10.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 39.95% | -24.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.73% | 49.23% | -28.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 39.40% | -16.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 39.40% | -16.06% |
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIQG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIQG.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIQG.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIQG.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIQG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIQG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.
AIQG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. AIQG.L tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence Index, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AIQG.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.
Find the right allocation for AIQG.L and SILG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer