PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AIQG.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIQG.L is traded in GBP, while DRVE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DRVE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQG.L achieves a 33.58% return, which is significantly lower than DRVE.L's 40.66% return.


AIQG.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
18.05%
YTD
33.58%
6M
33.50%
1Y
67.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRVE.L

1D
-1.76%
1M
9.58%
YTD
40.66%
6M
38.55%
1Y
89.84%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIQG.L and DRVE.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024

0.73

The correlation between AIQG.L and DRVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIQG.L
DRVE.L

Technology

75.7%
34.0%

Communication Services

9.6%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
26.8%

Industrials

5.5%
19.4%

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

14.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIQG.L
75.7%
DRVE.L
34.0%

Communication Services

AIQG.L
9.6%
DRVE.L
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AIQG.L
8.5%
DRVE.L
26.8%

Industrials

AIQG.L
5.5%
DRVE.L
19.4%

Financial Services

AIQG.L
0.4%
DRVE.L

-

Healthcare

AIQG.L
0.4%
DRVE.L

-

Basic Materials

AIQG.L

-

DRVE.L
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

AIQG.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Energy

AIQG.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Real Estate

AIQG.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Utilities

AIQG.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIQG.L
AIQG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AIQG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AIQG.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIQG.LDRVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.58

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

8.44

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

23.89

-11.08

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is comparable to the DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQG.L and DRVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIQG.LDRVE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22

3.82

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.95

0.27

+1.67

Drawdowns

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQG.L drawdown since its inception was -29.14%, smaller than the maximum DRVE.L drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQG.L and DRVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIQG.LDRVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.14%

-38.87%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-10.59%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.18%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-17.15%

+11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

3.75%

+1.48%

Volatility

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AIQG.L) is 7.62%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that AIQG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIQG.LDRVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

10.49%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

17.64%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.73%

23.43%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.34%

33.86%

-10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

33.86%

-10.52%

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DRVE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIQG.L vs. DRVE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIQG.L nor DRVE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIQG.L and DRVE.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIQG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIQG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVE.L.

AIQG.L tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence Index, while DRVE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AIQG.L and 0.50% for DRVE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIQG.L and DRVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer