AIQ vs. XT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AIQ tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIQ returned 16.16%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.

Performance

AIQ vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 15.73% return.

AIQ

• 1D: -5.57%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 24.56%
• 6M: 23.60%
• 1Y: 51.28%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: 16.16%
• 10Y*: —

XT

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 15.73%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 37.71%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: 14.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIQ vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	24.56%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-36.44%	17.09%	52.88%	39.94%	-14.05%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	15.73%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	16.43%	35.10%	30.74%	-8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and XT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.90

The correlation between AIQ and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQ vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIQ	XT
Technology	77.4%	46.7%
Communication Services	11.0%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	7.4%
Industrials	3.4%	7.7%
Financial Services	0.5%	3.0%
Healthcare	0.4%	24.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	4.9%

Return for Risk

AIQ vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 72
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIQ vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIQ	XT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.19	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.90	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.38	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.63	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	14.43	-4.37

AIQ vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and XT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIQ	XT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.66%	-34.41%	-10.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.47%	-10.45%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.35%	-22.09%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.66%	-34.41%	-10.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.68%	-4.18%	-5.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-7.39%	-2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.11%	2.62%	+2.49%

Volatility

AIQ vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 15.10% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 8.14%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIQ	XT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.10%	8.14%	+6.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.68%	13.78%	+8.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.54%	17.32%	+9.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.01%	21.00%	+5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.84%	20.12%	+5.72%

AIQ vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIQ vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than XT's 7.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	7.08%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIQ and XT in my portfolio?

AIQ and XT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIQ or XT?

AIQ has higher volatility (15.10%) compared to XT (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs XT's -34.41%.

Which ETF is better, AIQ or XT?

On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 16.16% vs 7.23% for XT. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIQ or XT?

Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 16.16% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIQ or XT?

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIQ or XT?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.

What is the main difference between AIQ and XT?

AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.46% for XT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.