AIQ vs. AIS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. AIQ is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, AIQ returned 39.46% vs 125.16% for AIS. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AIQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

AIQ vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 19.09% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 72.78% return.

AIQ

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 15.64%
• YTD: 19.09%
• 1Y: 39.46%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: 14.71%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.89%

AIS

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -12.08%
• 6M: 49.99%
• YTD: 72.78%
• 1Y: 125.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 77.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	$119.65M	$125.66M	$166.59M
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	$38.16M	$40.99M	$51.37M

AIQ vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	19.09%	31.89%	-1.20%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	72.78%	58.35%	-4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and AIS is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.89

The correlation between AIQ and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQ vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIQ	AIS
Technology	78.8%	87.2%
Communication Services	10.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	-
Industrials	3.6%	6.8%
Financial Services	0.5%	-0.0%
Healthcare	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.3%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

AIQ vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 53
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 89
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIQ vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIQ	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.64	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.87	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.39	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	3.66	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	14.88	-9.03

AIQ vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIQ	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.66%	-34.44%	-10.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.19%	-34.44%	+14.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.64%	-26.18%	+12.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.82%	-6.35%	-3.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.76%	8.44%	-1.68%

Volatility

AIQ vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is 10.54%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 20.84%. This indicates that AIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIQ	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.54%	20.84%	-10.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.90%	43.14%	-18.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.63%	47.84%	-19.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.45%	43.98%	-17.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.99%	43.98%	-17.99%

AIQ vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIQ vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.08%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIQ and AIS in my portfolio?

AIQ and AIS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIQ or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to AIQ (10.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs AIS's -34.44%.

Which ETF is better, AIQ or AIS?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 125.16% vs 39.46% for AIQ. On fees, AIQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIQ or AIS?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 125.16% return vs 39.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIQ or AIS?

AIQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIQ or AIS?

AIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIQ and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.75% for AIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.