AIO vs. PXSGX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AIO (Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund) and PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - AIO is a Technology Equities fund managed by Virtus, while PXSGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 5 years, AIO returned 12.16%/yr vs -4.85%/yr for PXSGX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIO charges 1.41%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for PXSGX.

Performance

AIO vs. PXSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIO achieves a 26.53% return, which is significantly higher than PXSGX's -2.25% return.

AIO

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.28%
• 6M: 16.45%
• YTD: 26.53%
• 1Y: 23.02%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: —

PXSGX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 5.29%
• 6M: -7.90%
• YTD: -2.25%
• 1Y: -17.88%
• 3Y*: -1.39%
• 5Y*: -4.85%
• 10Y*: 10.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIO vs. PXSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	26.53%	0.48%	54.48%	19.27%	-28.06%	13.51%	46.27%	1.05%
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund	-2.25%	-22.97%	21.11%	20.27%	-30.04%	4.47%	43.46%	4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AIO and PXSGX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2019	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between AIO and PXSGX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AIO vs. PXSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIO

AIO Risk / Return Rank: 34
AIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
AIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
AIO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
AIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
AIO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

PXSGX

PXSGX Risk / Return Rank: 1
PXSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
PXSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
PXSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PXSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PXSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIO vs. PXSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIO	PXSGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	-1.02	+2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	-1.46	+3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.85	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	-0.68	+2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.78	-1.12	+6.90

AIO vs. PXSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the PXSGX Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIO and PXSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIO vs. PXSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIO drawdown since its inception was -44.88%, smaller than the maximum PXSGX drawdown of -53.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIO and PXSGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIO	PXSGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.88%	-53.72%	+8.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-28.07%	+16.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.23%	-42.49%	+12.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.39%	-42.49%	+5.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.74%	-35.51%	+28.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.83%	-11.89%	+1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	17.12%	-13.13%

Volatility

AIO vs. PXSGX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) at 5.28%. This indicates that AIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIO	PXSGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	5.28%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.35%	13.30%	+2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.26%	18.84%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.34%	24.84%	-2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.87%	22.58%	+4.29%

AIO vs. PXSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIO has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than PXSGX's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIO vs. PXSGX - Dividend Comparison

AIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, less than PXSGX's 49.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	11.61%	13.75%	7.30%	10.34%	11.12%	19.97%	9.31%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund	49.01%	47.91%	20.72%	5.31%	17.32%	14.31%	9.64%	1.52%	2.31%	0.00%	2.69%	2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIO and PXSGX in my portfolio?

AIO and PXSGX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIO or PXSGX?

AIO has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to PXSGX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIO dropped -44.88% vs PXSGX's -53.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.