AINTX vs. FAOSX
AINTX (Ariel International Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AINTX returned 9.44%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for FAOSX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AINTX charges 1.13%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
AINTX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AINTX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- 6M
- 11.98%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.17%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -0.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
AINTX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AINTX Ariel International Fund | 16.45% | 31.39% | 5.23% | 10.02% | -11.33% | 4.31% | 6.84% | 12.83% | -9.82% | 14.21% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AINTX and FAOSX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AINTX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AINTX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
AINTX
FAOSX
AINTX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel International Fund (AINTX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AINTX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.93 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | -0.32 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | -0.48 | +8.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AINTX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINTX drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, smaller than the maximum FAOSX drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINTX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINTX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -36.24% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -7.26% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.39% | -13.96% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.31% | -36.24% | +10.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -5.86% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -7.90% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 4.48% | -0.87% |
Volatility
AINTX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
Ariel International Fund (AINTX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that AINTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AINTX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 0.00% | +5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | 0.00% | +14.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 7.68% | +8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 16.65% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 16.56% | -2.92% |
AINTX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AINTX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
AINTX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
AINTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.06%, more than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AINTX Ariel International Fund | 13.06% | 15.21% | 6.28% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 2.54% | 1.47% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.76% | 1.69% | 0.20% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AINTX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AINTX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AINTX dropped -27.95% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
AINTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AINTX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer