AINTX vs. APHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ariel International Fund (AINTX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX).
AINTX is managed by Ariel Investments. It was launched on Dec 29, 2011. APHIX is an actively managed fund by Artisan Partners. It was launched on Jul 1, 1997.
Performance
AINTX vs. APHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AINTX vs. APHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AINTX Ariel International Fund | -5.17% | 31.39% | 5.23% | 10.02% | -11.33% | 4.31% | 6.84% | 12.83% | -9.82% | 16.35% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 3.79% | 36.49% | 10.89% | 14.52% | -19.35% | 9.10% | 7.84% | 29.43% | -10.81% | 31.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AINTX achieves a -5.17% return, which is significantly lower than APHIX's 3.79% return. Over the past 10 years, AINTX has underperformed APHIX with an annualized return of 5.19%, while APHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.
AINTX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -11.41%
- YTD
- -5.17%
- 6M
- -3.10%
- 1Y
- 11.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 5.19%
APHIX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AINTX vs. APHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AINTX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than APHIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AINTX vs. APHIX — Risk / Return Rank
AINTX
APHIX
AINTX vs. APHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel International Fund (AINTX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AINTX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.86 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.39 | -1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.53 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | 10.66 | -7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AINTX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.86 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.62 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.29 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between AINTX and APHIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AINTX vs. APHIX - Dividend Comparison
AINTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.04%, less than APHIX's 21.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AINTX Ariel International Fund | 16.04% | 15.21% | 6.28% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 2.54% | 1.47% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.76% | 1.69% | 0.20% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 21.80% | 22.63% | 10.37% | 2.10% | 2.84% | 23.52% | 3.45% | 5.44% | 10.02% | 0.91% | 1.50% | 0.73% |
Drawdowns
AINTX vs. APHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINTX drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, smaller than the maximum APHIX drawdown of -68.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINTX and APHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINTX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -68.47% | +40.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -9.77% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.51% | -33.73% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.95% | -33.73% | +5.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.53% | -9.77% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -23.20% | +17.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.59% | +0.89% |
Volatility
AINTX vs. APHIX - Volatility Comparison
Ariel International Fund (AINTX) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX) at 6.04%. This indicates that AINTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AINTX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 6.04% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 10.13% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 15.33% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 15.61% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 16.16% | -2.67% |