PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AINF.L is traded in GBP, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 56.26% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's 16.86% return.


AINF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.48%
YTD
56.26%
6M
57.37%
1Y
102.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XSTC.L

1D
-1.90%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
16.86%
6M
17.10%
1Y
39.73%
3Y*
28.82%
5Y*
21.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and XSTC.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024

0.89

The correlation between AINF.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AINF.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.32

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.26

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

5.65

+0.69

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, roughly equal to the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-29.30%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.48%

-17.49%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-7.80%

+3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-6.29%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.16%

7.01%

+9.15%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 8.83%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.99%

8.83%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

15.85%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.67%

20.93%

+28.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.00%

22.42%

+21.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.00%

22.46%

+21.54%

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

AINF.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

AINF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.27%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AINF.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AINF.L.

AINF.L tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Net Index, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer