PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. WENS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 57.58% return, which is significantly higher than WENS.L's 31.38% return.


AINF.L

1D
-1.95%
1M
22.71%
YTD
57.58%
6M
57.54%
1Y
120.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WENS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
31.38%
6M
26.68%
1Y
44.00%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and WENS.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.07

The correlation between AINF.L and WENS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINF.LWENS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.37

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.78

2.99

+7.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.61

9.66

+26.95

AINF.L vs. WENS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.14, which is higher than the WENS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and WENS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINF.LWENS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14

2.06

+3.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

0.59

+1.93

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than WENS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and WENS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LWENS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-22.49%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-14.63%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-7.62%

+5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-9.15%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

4.54%

-1.26%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) at 7.96%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LWENS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

7.96%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

18.19%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

21.33%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.52%

21.49%

+5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.52%

21.49%

+5.03%

Dividends

AINF.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.L nor WENS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.75%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


AINF.L and WENS.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AINF.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while WENS.L is Energy Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.L and WENS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer