PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. VWRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 57.58% return, which is significantly higher than VWRP.L's 11.92% return.


AINF.L

1D
-1.95%
1M
22.71%
YTD
57.58%
6M
57.54%
1Y
120.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VWRP.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.32%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.40%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and VWRP.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.83

The correlation between AINF.L and VWRP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRP.L
VWRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINF.LVWRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.55

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.78

4.20

+6.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.61

17.06

+19.55

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.14, which is higher than the VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and VWRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINF.LVWRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14

2.87

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

0.82

+1.70

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than VWRP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and VWRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LVWRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-25.10%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-7.10%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.46%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-3.39%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

1.75%

+1.53%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) at 2.95%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LVWRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

2.95%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

7.68%

+9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

10.37%

+12.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.52%

12.87%

+13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.52%

14.96%

+11.56%

Dividends

AINF.L vs. VWRP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.L nor VWRP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AINF.L and VWRP.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AINF.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while VWRP.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.L and VWRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer