AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE).
AINF.L and SEC0.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AINF.L is managed by iShares. SEC0.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. It was launched on Aug 5, 2021.
Performance
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AINF.L iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 3.20% | 34.74% | 0.43% |
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.43% | 43.56% | 1.63% |
Different Trading Currencies
AINF.L is traded in GBP, while SEC0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SEC0.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than SEC0.DE's 16.43% return.
AINF.L
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 57.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEC0.DE
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 6M
- 34.47%
- 1Y
- 95.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AINF.L
SEC0.DE
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AINF.L | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.89 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 3.42 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | 7.52 | -2.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.97 | 25.63 | -8.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AINF.L | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.89 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.79 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between AINF.L and SEC0.DE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AINF.L nor SEC0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, smaller than the maximum SEC0.DE drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and SEC0.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINF.L | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -39.35% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -17.20% | +3.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -6.82% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -12.23% | +6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.80% | -0.43% |
Volatility
AINF.L vs. SEC0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) is 7.50%, while iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a volatility of 11.29%. This indicates that AINF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEC0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AINF.L | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 11.29% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 23.47% | -6.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.67% | 32.83% | -7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 28.80% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 28.80% | -2.81% |