PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AINF.L vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AINF.L vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
3.20%34.74%0.43%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
16.96%0.26%-4.21%
Different Trading Currencies

AINF.L is traded in GBP, while KROP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KROP values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 16.96% return.


AINF.L

1D
4.43%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
3.20%
6M
12.31%
1Y
57.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KROP

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
16.96%
6M
17.28%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
-7.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AINF.L vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.L vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINF.LKROPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

0.80

+1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

1.22

+1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.16

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

1.71

+3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.97

3.99

+12.98

AINF.L vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and KROP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINF.LKROPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

0.80

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

-0.60

+1.72

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and KROP is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AINF.L vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

AINF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.


TTM20252024202320222021
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
2.37%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and KROP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-61.96%

+33.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-11.29%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-49.60%

+45.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-44.32%

+38.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

4.78%

-1.41%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 5.51%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

5.51%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

12.59%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.67%

19.27%

+6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.99%

20.89%

+5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.99%

20.89%

+5.10%